Another 62-worder from David! Impressive. These low-count grids are extreme challenges. The huge amount of white space in the two big corners is daunting to think about filling. It's pretty unusual to be able to cleanly fill a region of such size while stuffing it with good material.
I was particularly delighted by the center section. I smiled upon uncovering DIVE BAR, and then further tickled to see it crossed by BIKER CHICK. Then when FAKE IDS and JIM BEAM and RATED R came into place it felt like I had stumbled upon a real treasure. It's tough to jam in that much great (and related) material into one place. And doing it without any real compromises is very impressive. That entire center section sings.
I might disagree with David on BIKEL though. Perhaps it's "clean," but I would argue that it's not "preferable." The difference to me between the central area and the NE is pretty big, perhaps because of how lively and clean the center is, but perhaps because BIKEL and BOMBE feel a bit esoteric to me. It's one thing to have some basic knowledge of a lot of different subjects, and another thing to know a specific area in such detail. Because it's a Saturday puzzle I believe that area is fair. It just didn't feel as fun to uncover as the central section, to me at least.
Like Will mentioned in his comments yesterday, I think that if having that BIKEL and BOMBE made the central area possible, that's well worth the price.
I expect that a NYT audience ought to at least have some knowledge in most areas. A Renaissance man/woman, right? If BIKEL had been a more famous Tevye player, like TOPOL (who got nominated for an Oscar in the role) or if BOMBE had been a more prevalent dessert, like TORTE, I would have liked that corner better. As it was, I had to guess whether it was BOMBE or BOMME or BOMTE, all of which looked French(-ish) to me. Totally subjective, of course. There are undoubtedly people who are indignantly reading this while watching a video of BIKEL or eating a BOMBE.
Ah, puzzle flow. One puzzle Jim points out help demonstrate my point. Note the seemingly small difference between the similarly shaped one from May? Today's puzzle stymied me in the NW corner, as there's only a single answer that can help you break into it (GENDER BIAS). If you can't grok that, like I couldn't, you're forced to work a mini-puzzle completely separated from the rest of the puzzle. That's not always a bad thing, but for a themeless puzzle, I feel it's much more elegant to have a high level of interconnects all throughout the puzzle.
Now check out the previous puzzle again. If you can't crack a single answer in the NW, you have multiple shots on goal to work into it — EMBEZZER and NOGALES both give you opportunities to uncover a little bit, giving you a hint to what LATE AUTUMN might be.
But today's arrangement does allow for some impressive fill. That center alone is gold. And both big corners are quite well filled, if not star-studded with marquee answers. I liked the NW in particular, even though I couldn't actually solve it (I gave up after 40 minutes). And I appreciated David's note about how he came up with BINGED ON, a great entry. Too often people think crosswords are generated by computers, but I find that a mix of computer assistance and pattern recognition (and trial and error) produce the best results.
Today was a tale of three cities, with one mini-puzzles that I solved (the SE), one that I loved (the center) and one that asked me to practice TOLERANCE. Still, a well executed puzzle overall.