This web browser is not supported. Use Chrome, Edge, Safari, or Firefox for best results.

Jack Reuter author page

1 puzzle by Jack Reuter
with Jim Horne comments

TotalDebut
17/7/2019
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
1000000
DebutFresh
1293%
Jack Reuter
Sun 7/7/2019 HIDDEN TACTICS
TIDEPODTHERANGESPRAT
ICONCUROOZESOUTEROSE
KERATINKNIGHTTOBEIGHT
IBMSOREKNEESANNUAL
BLACKANSELSMEDICINE
AUNTIEEMVEXTESTY
RETOTALCHIPSAHOYHIS
DISHONOURANA
BRAVOSPERKUPMAKESIT
OATERMORNRESINPANIC
ADOREAKUTERESAHUMPH
RINDSTABLEDPTSENOTE
DUCATINSETSPYSWINOS
SENESCECHOPUPESTOPS
TSACHEROKEES
BTWNOSFERATUCOWBIRD
IRISHBICGOSSAMER
FANTASIACMAJORWHITE
OCTANEPROMINENTTIS
CHECKMATEINONECOLLARS
AERIEFREETOGOAMPUTEE
LASERLANDEDONABSCESS

I liked this more than Jeff did for a few reasons:

  • I'm a sucker for novelty, and this puzzle is undoubtedly innovative.
  • The layout is a plausible end-game situation.
  • The mate-in-one problem is non-trivial but simple enough for casual players to see.
  • I care less about inelegancies than Jeff does.

Fun fact: this is the first 22x22 NYT crossword.

Update: One of the great things about the Internet (truly) is that when you say something stupid online, you get a flood of responses pointing out your, let's not say abject stupidity, but rather, uh, well, stupid is close. I previously somehow claimed that squares without circles or triangles were not legitimate chess symbols. Not even close. There are extra Rs, an extra N, and even an extra K (We Three Kings!) Even my first comment about innovation is incorrect. Patrick Blindauer created a similar puzzle in 2007 for the New York Sun, edited by Peter Gordon.

Thanks to all our loyal readers who called me out.

XWord Info Home
XWord Info © 2007-2024, Jim Horne
44 ms